Voting districtsIFP 5ANC 1darker = bigger win

Dots: voting stations

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

IFP 31.6%down 24.2 pts from 55.8% in 2021

Most party (PR) votes

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Turnout45.3%

Voters on the roll1 097

South Africa · Counting23 693 of 23 696 voting districts in (99.9%)

checked 11:11Latest results

Voting station

Isolesizwe High SchoolMvuntshini Area Gwabalanda Mpukunyoni TribalGwabalanda, Mpukunyoni Tribal

PR ballot ? · 494 valid votes

IFPInkatha Freedom Party15631.6%
SIPSiyanqoba Independent Party13827.9%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party8517.2%
ANCAfrican National Congress438.7%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters204.0%
AEFAfrican Economic Freedom173.4%
DADemocratic Alliance71.4%
JCJozini Congress51.0%
KZNIKzn Independence40.8%
NFPNational Freedom Party30.6%
UCDPUnited Christian Democratic Party20.4%
UDMUnited Democratic Movement20.4%
AICAfrican Independent Congress20.4%
SACPSouth African Communist Party20.4%
I.L.PIzwe Lethu Party20.4%
GJDPGods Justice and Development Party20.4%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party10.2%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement10.2%
LABOURLabour Party of South Africa10.2%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement10.2%

ESP areas in this voting district · 3 ?

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Votes cast 497 · spoilt 3 · special votes 32 · All 1 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in this voting district (497 of 1 097). The IEC publishes 45.4%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same voting district, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (475); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (433); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

The DC 40% ? ballot is published per municipality: Inkosi uMtubatuba's DC 40% result.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

The voting station is from the IEC's voting station list for the 2026 elections.

IEC data last fetched 09 Nov 2026, 04:21 SAST.