Voting districtsActionSA 5darker = bigger win

Dots: voting stations

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

ActionSA 57.3%up 46.6 pts from 10.7% in 2021

Most party (PR) votes

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Turnout42.5%

Voters on the roll1 967

South Africa · Counting23 694 of 23 696 voting districts in (100.0%)

checked 22:43Latest results

Voting station

Asamath's Institute of Academy601 Rabat Street Isiphethweni Section TembisaIsiphethweni Section, Tembisa

PR ballot ? · 826 valid votes

ActionSA47357.3%
ANCAfrican National Congress17521.2%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters9411.4%
DADemocratic Alliance455.4%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party202.4%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus50.6%
SACPSouth African Communist Party40.5%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement30.4%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania20.2%
UATUnited Africans Transformation20.2%
AZAPOAzanian People's Organisation10.1%
PAPatriotic Alliance10.1%
AGFAzanian Ground Forces10.1%

ESP areas in this voting district · 1 ?

Isiphetweni

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Votes cast 835 · spoilt 9 · special votes 33 · All 1 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in this voting district (835 of 1 967). The IEC publishes 44.3%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same voting district, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 473 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (905); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (370); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1851: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

The voting station is from the IEC's voting station list for the 2026 elections.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 16:15 SAST.