Voting districtsACM 3ANC 2darker = bigger win

Dots: voting stations

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

ACM 50.2%up 48.3 pts from 1.9% in 2021

Most party (PR) votes

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Turnout48.8%

Voters on the roll1 386

South Africa · Counting21 124 of 23 696 voting districts in (89.1%)

checked 16:36Latest results

Voting station

Molibeli Primary SchoolKatlehong Maluti A PhofungKatlehong, Maluti A Phofung

PR ballot ? · 673 valid votes

ACMAfrican Content Movement33850.2%
ANCAfrican National Congress16123.9%
DADemocratic Alliance6710.0%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters324.8%
DPSADikwankwetla Party of South Africa233.4%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement91.3%
UATUnited Africans Transformation91.3%
ACTAfrican Congress for Transformation71.0%
AHCAfrican Heart Congress50.7%
SACPSouth African Communist Party40.6%
AMC.ROY.African Movement Congress40.6%
PAPatriotic Alliance30.4%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania20.3%
ECOFORUMEconomic Emancipation Forum20.3%
MAP16Mapsixteen Civic Movement20.3%
SARKOSouth African Royal Kingdoms Organization20.3%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party10.1%
ALJAMAAl Jama-ah10.1%
AULAAll Unemployment Labour Alliance10.1%

ESP areas in this voting district · 2 ?

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Votes cast 677 · spoilt 4 · special votes 30 · All 1 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in this voting district (677 of 1 386). The IEC publishes 48.9%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same voting district, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 338 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (973); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (498); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

The DC 40% ? ballot is published per municipality: Maluti a Phofung's DC 40% result.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

The voting station is from the IEC's voting station list for the 2026 elections.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 08:32 SAST.