Moriting Wa Thuto Secondary School

Get the app
Voting district 22270069: ANC 56.9%Voting district 22410054: ANC 69.5%Voting district 22410098: ANC 71.9%Voting district 22410278: VF PLUS 35.7%Voting district 22410469: ANC 60.3%Voting district 22160012: DA 54.1%Moriting Wa Thuto Secondary School (VD 22160012)Tsepano 111 Public School (VD 22270069)Tent Next To Welvanpas Primary School (VD 22410054)Loskop Farm (VD 22410098)Tent At Caroline Farm (VD 22410278)Breda Combined Farm School (VD 22410469)
Voting districtsANC 4DA 1VF PLUS 1darker = bigger win
Dots: voting stations
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

DA 54.1%up 27.8 pts from 26.3% in 2021

Most party (PR) votes

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Turnout53.8%
Voters on the roll1 815
South Africa · Counting20 925 of 23 696 voting districts in (88.3%)
checked Latest results

Voting station

Moriting Wa Thuto Secondary School058 2561778 Clarens ClarensClarens, Clarens

PR ballot ? · 940 valid votes

ESP areas in this voting district · 3 ?

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Votes cast 976 · spoilt 36 · special votes 156 · All 1 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in this voting district (976 of 1 815). The IEC publishes 53.9%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same voting district, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 509 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1475); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (551); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 0: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (208); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

The DC 40% ? ballot is published per municipality: Dihlabeng's DC 40% result.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

The voting station is from the IEC's voting station list for the 2026 elections.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 16:31 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it