Ward 7

Voting district 87000027: VF PLUS 66.9%Voting district 87000038: not in yetKoster Gekombineerde Skool (VD 87000027)Emmanuel Hope Center (VD 87000038)
Voting districtsVF PLUS 1No results, yetdarker = bigger win
Dots: voting stations
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

VF PLUS 66.9%

Leading on the PR ballot so far (provisional)

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting2 278 of 23 696 voting districts in (9.6%)checked Latest results
This ward1 of 2 voting districts in
Turnout so far52.0%
Voters on the roll so far1 897

PR ballot ? · 985 valid votes

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

Who won Ward 7?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Ward 7 ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages

Voting districts · 2 ?

Candidates · 14

Source: IEC certified candidate list (PDF, 16 Sept 2026)

This ward in earlier elections ?

ESP areas in this ward · 9 ?

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Votes cast 985 · spoilt 2 · special votes 244 · 1 of 2 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 1 voting district with results so far here (987 of 1 897). The IEC publishes 52.0%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same ward (the ward that covered the same area then), both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 645 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1916); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (436); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (360); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2078: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 87000027: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 659 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1916); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 87000027: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (436); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 87000027: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (360); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 87000027: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 87000027: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 87000027: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 87000027: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 87000027: party 2078: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 87000027: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 87000027: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 87000027: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 87000027: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 87000027: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 87000027: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 87000027: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 87000027: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 87000027: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 87000027: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

The DC 40% ? ballot is published per municipality: Kgetlengrivier's DC 40% result.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 04:46 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it