ANC 52.9%
Leading on the PR ballot so far (provisional)
- ANC 52.9%
- MKP 10.8%
- DA 10.3%
- Others 26.1%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
PR ballot ? · 1 315 valid votes
ANCAfrican National Congress69552.9%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party14210.8%
DADemocratic Alliance13510.3%- SDPService Delivery Party916.9%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters695.2%
ActionSA332.5%- AIPOAfrican Independent People's Organisation221.7%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania191.4%- SACPSouth African Communist Party171.3%
INGUBOAbafuna Ingubo Yeskhethu Party151.1%
PAPatriotic Alliance131.0%- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement110.8%
- ASCOAsihlanganeni Civic Movement110.8%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus90.7%
SPPSindawonye Progressive Party80.6%
APCAfrican People's Convention60.5%
AHCAfrican Heart Congress50.4%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement30.2%- Mo-Africa PartyMo-Africa Party30.2%
- ARRC.African Royal Rainbow Congress30.2%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party20.2%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party10.1%
SUNSizwe Ummah Nation10.1%- BCOBahlali Civic Organization10.1%
ESP app
How long is the queue?
Chat about the election in your area
ESP app
How did Thembisile Hani vote?
Get notified when it's declared
Hours off in Thembisile Hani ?
Reported in the ESP app
Wards · 33
- Ward 111 of 6 voting districts inANC 43.8%
- Ward 161 of 6 voting districts inANC 66.9%
- Ward 191 of 5 voting districts inSDP 40.4%
- Ward 241 of 3 voting districts inANC 74.7%
- Ward 261 of 5 voting districts inMKP 41.9%
- Ward 333 of 7 voting districts inANC 45.6%
- Ward 1Not in yet
- Ward 2Not in yet
- Ward 3Not in yet
- Ward 4Not in yet
- Ward 5Not in yet
- Ward 6Not in yet
- Ward 7Not in yet
- Ward 8Not in yet
- Ward 9Not in yet
- Ward 10Not in yet
- Ward 12Not in yet
- Ward 13Not in yet
- Ward 14Not in yet
- Ward 15Not in yet
- Ward 17Not in yet
- Ward 18Not in yet
- Ward 20Not in yet
- Ward 21Not in yet
- Ward 22Not in yet
- Ward 23Not in yet
- Ward 25Not in yet
- Ward 27Not in yet
- Ward 28Not in yet
- Ward 29Not in yet
- Ward 30Not in yet
- Ward 31Not in yet
- Ward 32Not in yet
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 103 · 8 of 154 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 8 voting districts with results so far here (1 016 of 2 023). The IEC publishes 50.3%.
The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.
Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 2975 differs from the sum of party rows 3956 by 981; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3233: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (313); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (222); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 213 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (649); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 03:35 SAST.