Thaba Chweu

Ward 1: ANC 61.3% (Ward ballot)Ward 2: 1 of 3 voting districts in, ANC 58.8% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 3: not in yetWard 4: ANC 42.1% (Ward ballot)Ward 5: 2 of 4 voting districts in, ANC 44.8% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 6: not in yetWard 7: not in yetWard 8: not in yetWard 9: not in yetWard 10: not in yetWard 11: 6 of 8 voting districts in, ANC 38.7% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 12: 1 of 2 voting districts in, DA 68.9% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 13: 3 of 6 voting districts in, ANC 41.2% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 14: not in yet
WardsANC 6DA 1Partly counted 5No results, yetdarker = bigger win
Wards coloured by the Ward ballot: the IEC doesn't publish the PR ballot per ward
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

ANC 41.4%

Leading on the PR ballot so far (provisional)

Vote breakdown · PR ballot
  • ANC 41.4%
  • DA 21.7%
  • EFF 18.5%
  • Others 18.3%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting1 552 of 23 696 voting districts in (6.5%)checked Latest results
Thaba Chweu18 of 47 voting districts in2 of 14 wards complete
Turnout so far47.6%
Voters on the roll so far13 297

PR ballot ? · 7 648 valid votes

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did Thaba Chweu vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Thaba Chweu ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power112hours off15 outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet10hours off1 outage
May: 0 hours off0MayJun · Power: 26 hours offJun: 26 hours off26JunJul · Power: 18 hours offJul: 18 hours off18JulAug · Power: 26 hours offAug: 26 hours off26AugSep · Power: 33 hours offSep · Internet: 10 hours offSep: 43 hours off43SepOct · Power: 9 hours offOct: 9 hours off9Oct

Wards · 14

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 778 · 19 of 47 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 19 voting districts with results so far here (6 377 of 13 393). The IEC publishes 48.1%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 17592 differs from the sum of party rows 22868 by 5276; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 668 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1973); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (390); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (392); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 613 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1868); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 580 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1696); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (414); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 603 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1790); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 227 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (689); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (590); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (383); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (595); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (497); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 809 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2389); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 237 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (689); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 226 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (701); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (562); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (244); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 03:41 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it