Lekwa

special votes 103 · 10 of 43 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 10 voting districts with results so far here (2 903 of 5 294). The IEC publishes 54.8%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 8327 differs from the sum of party rows 8610 by 283; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.

Note: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 713 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1826); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 287 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (934); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (772); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (662); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (256); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (573); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (433); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (225); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 03:39 SAST.