Sakhisizwe

Ward 1: not in yetWard 2: not in yetWard 3: 4 of 11 voting districts in, ANC 74.3% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 4: not in yetWard 5: not in yetWard 6: 5 of 9 voting districts in, ANC 56.3% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 7: 2 of 8 voting districts in, ANC 61.9% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 8: 1 of 9 voting districts in, ANC 84.9% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 9: 1 of 12 voting districts in, ANC 77.9% so far (Ward ballot)
WardsANC 5Partly counted 5No results, yetdarker = bigger win
Wards coloured by the Ward ballot: the IEC doesn't publish the PR ballot per ward
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

ANC 69.1%

Leading on the PR ballot so far (provisional)

Vote breakdown · PR ballot
  • ANC 69.1%
  • DA 10.7%
  • EFF 7.2%
  • Others 13.0%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting1 552 of 23 696 voting districts in (6.5%)checked Latest results
Sakhisizwe13 of 62 voting districts in0 of 9 wards complete
Turnout so far47.2%
Voters on the roll so far5 240

PR ballot ? · 2 355 valid votes

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did Sakhisizwe vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Sakhisizwe ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages

Wards · 9

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 359 · 13 of 62 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 13 voting districts with results so far here (2 071 of 4 387). The IEC publishes 39.5%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 6388 differs from the sum of party rows 7316 by 928; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 456 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1361); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (260); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 396 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1197); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 219 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (657); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 248 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (739); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (266); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: the IEC's published turnout for this municipality is 39.53%; its own counts give 47.21% (PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in its voting districts); we show the calculated figure.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 03:40 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it