ANC 54.4%
Leading on the PR ballot so far (provisional)
- ANC 54.4%
- EFF 8.5%
- ATM 8.5%
- Others 28.7%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
PR ballot ? · 3 808 valid votes
ANCAfrican National Congress2 07154.4%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters3228.5%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement3228.5%- SACPSouth African Communist Party3068.0%
- AMC.ROY.African Movement Congress2757.2%
DADemocratic Alliance2105.5%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party461.2%- PECPhakama Eastern Cape431.1%
AICAfrican Independent Congress411.1%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania340.9%
AUCAfrican Unemployed Congress240.6%- THE VOICEVoice of the Voiceless Civic Organization230.6%
- ACTAfrican Congress for Transformation190.5%
- MRRAMthatha Ratepayers and Residents Association150.4%
URFUnited Residents Front100.3%
PAPatriotic Alliance90.2%- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement90.2%
LANDLand Party80.2%- IRPIndependent Rural Party80.2%
OHMOrganic Humanity Movement70.2%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party60.2%
ESP app
How long is the queue?
Chat about the election in your area
ESP app
How did King Sabata Dalindyebo vote?
Get notified when it's declared
Hours off in King Sabata Dalindyebo ?
Reported in the ESP app
Wards · 37
- Ward 11 of 8 voting districts inANC 41.6%
- Ward 71 of 5 voting districts inANC 38.4%
- Ward 101 of 10 voting districts inANC 50.0%
- Ward 121 of 5 voting districts inUDM 47.6%
- Ward 131 of 11 voting districts inANC 85.9%
- Ward 142 of 8 voting districts inANC 48.1%
- Ward 151 of 12 voting districts inUDM 50.2%
- Ward 161 of 11 voting districts inANC 58.8%
- Ward 171 of 13 voting districts inANC 54.6%
- Ward 201 of 17 voting districts inANC 36.2%
- Ward 221 of 15 voting districts inUDM 85.6%
- Ward 241 of 12 voting districts inANC 76.6%
- Ward 261 of 15 voting districts inUDM 81.8%
- Ward 281 of 17 voting districts inANC 92.6%
- Ward 343 of 10 voting districts inANC 54.1%
- Ward 353 of 12 voting districts inSACP 36.7%
- Ward 361 of 12 voting districts inANC 68.7%
- Ward 2Not in yet
- Ward 3Not in yet
- Ward 4Not in yet
- Ward 5Not in yet
- Ward 6Not in yet
- Ward 8Not in yet
- Ward 9Not in yet
- Ward 11Not in yet
- Ward 18Not in yet
- Ward 19Not in yet
- Ward 21–
- Ward 23Not in yet
- Ward 25Not in yet
- Ward 27–
- Ward 29Not in yet
- Ward 30Not in yet
- Ward 31Not in yet
- Ward 32Not in yet
- Ward 33Not in yet
- Ward 37Not in yet
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 476 · 24 of 363 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 24 voting districts with results so far here (3 525 of 9 506). The IEC publishes 37.4%.
The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.
Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 10603 differs from the sum of party rows 12067 by 1464; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (244); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3215: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (384); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3215: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3215: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 268 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (829); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (504); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3215: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (264); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3215: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (319); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (233); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (208); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (628); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (342); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 294 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (905); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (367); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (283); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (286); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 03:41 SAST.