WardsANC 4DA 2Independent 1Partly counted 7darker = bigger win

Wards coloured by the Ward ballot: the IEC doesn't publish the PR ballot per ward

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

ANC 49.6%

Leading on the PR ballot so far (provisional)

Vote breakdown · PR ballot

ANC 49.6%
DA 25.3%
GKCM 13.8%
Others 11.3%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting1 552 of 23 696 voting districts in (6.5%)checked 03:39Latest results

Great Kei16 of 43 voting districts in0 of 7 wards complete

Turnout so far60.9%

Voters on the roll so far4 089

PR ballot ? · 2 396 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress1 18849.6%
DADemocratic Alliance60725.3%
GKCMGreat Kei Community Movement33113.8%
SACPSouth African Communist Party1104.6%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus702.9%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters482.0%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party140.6%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement120.5%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party80.3%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement50.2%
PAPatriotic Alliance30.1%

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did Great Kei vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Great Kei ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power66hours off7 outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

Wards · 7

On EskomSePush

Great KeiPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 253 · 16 of 43 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 16 voting districts with results so far here (2 490 of 4 089). The IEC publishes 60.9%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (525); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (290); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 265 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (787); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 615 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1815); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (305); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (297); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 218 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (658); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (416); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (337); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 03:34 SAST.