ANC 53.0%
Leading on the PR ballot so far (provisional)
- ANC 53.0%
- DA 27.7%
- The Independents 5.8%
- Others 13.6%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
PR ballot ? · 3 589 valid votes
ANCAfrican National Congress1 90153.0%
DADemocratic Alliance99327.7%- The IndependentsThe Independents2075.8%
- SACPSouth African Communist Party1373.8%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters1063.0%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party942.6%
AICAfrican Independent Congress320.9%
ActionSA300.8%
PAPatriotic Alliance290.8%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement180.5%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania150.4%- KPAKomani Progress Action70.2%
- AMC.ROY.African Movement Congress70.2%
- ACTAfrican Congress for Transformation50.1%
- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement40.1%
- ILISOIliso Labantu Movement for Social Change20.1%
OHMOrganic Humanity Movement10.0%- LABOURLabour Party of South Africa10.0%
ESP app
How long is the queue?
Chat about the election in your area
ESP app
How did Enoch Mgijima vote?
Get notified when it's declared
Hours off in Enoch Mgijima ?
Reported in the ESP app
Wards · 34
- Ward 12 of 8 voting districts inANC 39.5%
- Ward 41 of 4 voting districts inANC 52.8%
- Ward 182 of 8 voting districts inThe Independents 24.3%
- Ward 202 of 11 voting districts inANC 47.2%
- Ward 212 of 9 voting districts inANC 87.3%
- Ward 224 of 11 voting districts inANC 56.1%
- Ward 241 of 5 voting districts inANC 78.4%
- Ward 271 of 6 voting districts inDA 84.5%
- Ward 283 of 6 voting districts inDA 66.0%
- Ward 292 of 4 voting districts inDA 49.3%
- Ward 321 of 8 voting districts inANC 92.4%
- Ward 2Not in yet
- Ward 3Not in yet
- Ward 5Not in yet
- Ward 6Not in yet
- Ward 7Not in yet
- Ward 8Not in yet
- Ward 9Not in yet
- Ward 10Not in yet
- Ward 11Not in yet
- Ward 12Not in yet
- Ward 13Not in yet
- Ward 14Not in yet
- Ward 15Not in yet
- Ward 16Not in yet
- Ward 17Not in yet
- Ward 19Not in yet
- Ward 23Not in yet
- Ward 25Not in yet
- Ward 26Not in yet
- Ward 30Not in yet
- Ward 31Not in yet
- Ward 33Not in yet
- Ward 34Not in yet
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 176 · 21 of 168 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 21 voting districts with results so far here (3 201 of 6 340). The IEC publishes 50.6%.
The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.
Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 9438 differs from the sum of party rows 10749 by 1311; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (330); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (292); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (452); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (510); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 272 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (927); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (277); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 549 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1613); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (642); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 212 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (654); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (492); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 03:41 SAST.