Drakenstein

Results are not shown because IEC figures did not reconcile: ward ballot valid 1550 + spoilt 4 != cast 1080; ward ballot valid 392 + spoilt 0 != cast 0. We report this rather than guess.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 14 voting districts with results so far here (10 609 of 18 711). The IEC publishes 58.9%.

Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 32769 differs from the sum of party rows 35263 by 2494; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3608); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (490); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2172: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 1076 differs from the sum of party rows 1550 by 474; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1264 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3818); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (442); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (533); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (270); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 434 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1310); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (439); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 686 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2036); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (644); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (245); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 580 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1745); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2172: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 541 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1656); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 249 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (771); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 0 differs from the sum of party rows 392 by 392; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 889 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2687); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 263 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (779); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (583); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2172: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1941 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5791); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 476 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1455); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (449); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (250); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: the IEC's published turnout for this municipality is 58.87%; its own counts give 56.70% (PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in its voting districts); we show the calculated figure.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 03:41 SAST.