Partly counted 9No results, yet

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting1 552 of 23 696 voting districts in (6.5%)checked 03:44Latest results

City of Mbombela18 of 285 voting districts in0 of 45 wards complete

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did City of Mbombela vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in City of Mbombela ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power195hours off20 outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

Wards · 45

On EskomSePush

City of MbombelaPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Results are not shown because IEC figures did not reconcile: ward ballot valid 722 + spoilt 21 != cast 345. We report this rather than guess.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 19 voting districts with results so far here (3 925 of 9 872). The IEC publishes 44.2%.

Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 12287 differs from the sum of party rows 15986 by 3699; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (520); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (415); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 287 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (853); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (612); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (538); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (300); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 211 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (658); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (437); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (677); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (434); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (350); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 398 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1200); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (437); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 313 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (434); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (262); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 324 differs from the sum of party rows 722 by 398; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: the IEC's published turnout for this municipality is 44.19%; its own counts give 39.76% (PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in its voting districts); we show the calculated figure.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 03:41 SAST.