City of Johannesburg

Ward 1: not in yetWard 2: not in yetWard 3: not in yetWard 4: not in yetWard 5: not in yetWard 6: not in yetWard 7: not in yetWard 8: not in yetWard 9: not in yetWard 10: not in yetWard 11: not in yetWard 12: not in yetWard 13: not in yetWard 14: not in yetWard 15: not in yetWard 16: not in yetWard 17: not in yetWard 18: not in yetWard 19: not in yetWard 20: not in yetWard 21: not in yetWard 22: not in yetWard 23: not in yetWard 24: not in yetWard 25: not in yetWard 26: not in yetWard 27: not in yetWard 28: not in yetWard 29: not in yetWard 30: not in yetWard 31: not in yetWard 32: not in yetWard 33: not in yetWard 34: not in yetWard 35: not in yetWard 36: not in yetWard 37: not in yetWard 38: not in yetWard 39: not in yetWard 40: not in yetWard 41: not in yetWard 42: not in yetWard 43: not in yetWard 44: not in yetWard 45: not in yetWard 46: not in yetWard 47: not in yetWard 48: not in yetWard 49: not in yetWard 50: not in yetWard 51: 1 of 8 voting districts in, ANC 34.3% so farWard 52: not in yetWard 53: not in yetWard 54: not in yetWard 55: not in yetWard 56: not in yetWard 57: not in yetWard 58: not in yetWard 59: not in yetWard 60: not in yetWard 61: not in yetWard 62: not in yetWard 63: not in yetWard 64: not in yetWard 65: not in yetWard 66: not in yetWard 67: not in yetWard 68: not in yetWard 69: not in yetWard 70: 1 of 9 voting districts in, DA 75.9% so farWard 71: not in yetWard 72: not in yetWard 73: not in yetWard 74: not in yetWard 75: not in yetWard 76: not in yetWard 77: not in yetWard 78: not in yetWard 79: not in yetWard 80: not in yetWard 81: not in yetWard 82: not in yetWard 83: not in yetWard 84: not in yetWard 85: not in yetWard 86: not in yetWard 87: not in yetWard 88: not in yetWard 89: not in yetWard 90: not in yetWard 91: not in yetWard 92: not in yetWard 93: not in yetWard 94: not in yetWard 95: not in yetWard 96: not in yetWard 97: not in yetWard 98: not in yetWard 99: not in yetWard 100: not in yetWard 101: not in yetWard 102: not in yetWard 103: not in yetWard 104: not in yetWard 105: not in yetWard 106: not in yetWard 107: not in yetWard 108: not in yetWard 109: not in yetWard 110: not in yetWard 111: not in yetWard 112: not in yetWard 113: not in yetWard 114: not in yetWard 115: not in yetWard 116: not in yetWard 117: not in yetWard 118: not in yetWard 119: not in yetWard 120: not in yetWard 121: not in yetWard 122: 1 of 11 voting districts in, DA 30.6% so farWard 123: not in yetWard 124: not in yetWard 125: 1 of 7 voting districts in, DA 49.4% so farWard 126: not in yetWard 127: 1 of 8 voting districts in, ActionSA 64.2% so farWard 128: not in yetWard 129: not in yetWard 130: not in yetWard 131: not in yetWard 132: not in yetWard 133: not in yetWard 134: not in yetWard 135: not in yet
WardsDA 3ANC 1ActionSA 1Partly counted 5No results, yetdarker = bigger win
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too
200020062011201620212026

DA 32.9%

Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)

Vote breakdown · Ward ballot
  • DA 32.9%
  • ActionSA 22.2%
  • ANC 18.4%
  • Others 26.6%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting1 552 of 23 696 voting districts in (6.5%)checked Latest results
City of Johannesburg5 of 862 voting districts in0 of 135 wards complete
Turnout so far60.0%
Voters on the roll so far2 415

Ward ballot ? · 1 435 valid votes

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did City of Johannesburg vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in City of Johannesburg ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power143khours off10k outages
Water68khours off4 459 outages
Internet9 612hours off814 outages
May · Power: 20 247 hours offMay · Water: 4 374 hours offMay · Internet: 519 hours offMay: 25 140 hours off25kMayJun · Power: 22 059 hours offJun · Water: 10 716 hours offJun · Internet: 991 hours offJun: 33 766 hours off34kJunJul · Power: 22 950 hours offJul · Water: 12 946 hours offJul · Internet: 2 501 hours offJul: 38 397 hours off38kJulAug · Power: 26 199 hours offAug · Water: 10 984 hours offAug · Internet: 2 147 hours offAug: 39 330 hours off39kAugSep · Power: 28 247 hours offSep · Water: 10 348 hours offSep · Internet: 2 179 hours offSep: 40 774 hours off41kSepOct · Power: 23 588 hours offOct · Water: 18 538 hours offOct · Internet: 1 276 hours offOct: 43 402 hours off43kOct

Wards · 135

On EskomSePush

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 98 · 5 of 862 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 5 voting districts with results so far here (1 449 of 2 415). The IEC publishes 60.0%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (348); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3204: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1041: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 239 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (457); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2163: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (232); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 204 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (393); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3204: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 03:40 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it