Dihlabeng

Ward 1: not in yetWard 2: not in yetWard 3: not in yetWard 4: not in yetWard 5: not in yetWard 6: not in yetWard 7: not in yetWard 8: not in yetWard 9: 1 of 5 voting districts inWard 10: 1 of 4 voting districts inWard 11: not in yetWard 12: not in yetWard 13: not in yetWard 14: 2 of 6 voting districts inWard 15: not in yetWard 16: 1 of 4 voting districts inWard 17: not in yetWard 18: 1 of 6 voting districts inWard 19: 3 of 6 voting districts in
Partly counted 6No results, yet
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too
200020062011201620212026

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting1 552 of 23 696 voting districts in (6.5%)checked Latest results
Dihlabeng9 of 79 voting districts in0 of 19 wards complete

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did Dihlabeng vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Dihlabeng ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power77hours off10 outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages
May: 0 hours off0MayJun · Power: 10 hours offJun: 10 hours off10JunJul · Power: 13 hours offJul: 13 hours off13JulAug · Power: 31 hours offAug: 31 hours off31AugSep · Power: 13 hours offSep: 13 hours off13SepOct · Power: 10 hours offOct: 10 hours off10Oct

Wards · 19

On EskomSePush

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Results are not shown because IEC figures did not reconcile: ward ballot valid 109 + spoilt 0 != cast 0. We report this rather than guess.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 9 voting districts with results so far here (798 of 1 775). The IEC publishes 51.3%.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (246); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (337); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 0 differs from the sum of party rows 109 by 109; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: the IEC's published turnout for this municipality is 51.32%; its own counts give 44.96% (PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in its voting districts); we show the calculated figure.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 03:35 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it