Raymond Mhlaba

Ward 1: not in yetWard 2: 1 of 5 voting districts inWard 3: not in yetWard 4: not in yetWard 5: 1 of 7 voting districts inWard 6: not in yetWard 7: 3 of 6 voting districts inWard 8: 2 of 5 voting districts inWard 9: 3 of 18 voting districts inWard 10: 3 of 10 voting districts inWard 11: 1 of 3 voting districts inWard 12: 2 of 9 voting districts inWard 13: not in yetWard 14: 3 of 14 voting districts inWard 15: 3 of 9 voting districts inWard 16: not in yetWard 17: 1 of 9 voting districts inWard 18: 2 of 9 voting districts inWard 19: not in yetWard 20: not in yetWard 21: not in yet
Partly counted 12No results, yet
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too
200020062011201620212026

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting1 552 of 23 696 voting districts in (6.5%)checked Latest results
Raymond Mhlaba25 of 154 voting districts in0 of 21 wards complete

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did Raymond Mhlaba vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Raymond Mhlaba ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power12hours off1 outage
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages
May: 0 hours off0MayJun: 0 hours off0JunJul: 0 hours off0JulAug · Power: 12 hours offAug: 12 hours off12AugSep: 0 hours off0SepOct: 0 hours off0Oct

Wards · 21

On EskomSePush

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Results are not shown because IEC figures did not reconcile: ward ballot valid 88 + spoilt 0 != cast 0. We report this rather than guess.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 26 voting districts with results so far here (2 445 of 5 604). The IEC publishes 43.7%.

Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 7225 differs from the sum of party rows 7532 by 307; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (550); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 0 differs from the sum of party rows 88 by 88; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 281 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (840); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 245 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (720); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 355 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1052); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (398); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 252 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (759); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 03:34 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it